2026 Legacy League model
Inside the $100K Legacy League: Our Model’s Favorite and Week 17 Forecast
Twelve managers paid $100,000 apiece. We verified all 240 picks, modeled every roster and ran 100,000 seasons to find the title favorite—and the most likely Week 17 top-two pairing.
By Sportshack Research · updated August 30, 2026

Model freeze: August 30, 2026 at 12:26 p.m. ET. These are simulation-based fantasy forecasts, not results or guarantees.
Twelve fantasy managers put up $100,000 apiece—$1.2 million in entry fees—for the sold-out 2026 NFFC Legacy League at Circa in Las Vegas. First place pays $600,000. With that much riding on one 20-round draft, we wanted to answer a simple question: who built the strongest team?
So we rebuilt the draft pick by pick, valued every roster under the league’s actual scoring and simulated the complete season 100,000 times. The result is a fair, no-vig title market—not a promise, and not a sportsbook line. Schroeder is the favorite at 17.46%, with Santos the closest challenger at 13.96%.
The fair title market
Schroeder’s roster combines the league’s best projected weekly average, its highest 10th-percentile floor and the largest title share in the simulation. Santos lands just behind him with the model’s most resilient challenger: a deep running-back group, a strong receiving base and Bo Nix at a favorable draft cost.
| Rank | Team | Title probability | Fair odds | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schroeder | 17.46% | +475 | 53.9% |
| 2 | Santos | 13.96% | +615 | 49.8% |
| 3 | Feinberg | 12.26% | +715 | 47.1% |
| 4 | Dawoud | 10.91% | +815 | 44.2% |
| 5 | Derricks | 8.49% | +1,075 | 35.0% |
| 6 | Bosse | 8.33% | +1,100 | 35.8% |
| 7 | Delaney | 7.73% | +1,200 | 30.9% |
| 8 | Katz | 7.20% | +1,300 | 32.7% |
| 9 | Kouri | 6.92% | +1,350 | 31.7% |
| 10 | Oster | 5.09% | +1,875 | 25.5% |
| 11 | Behar | 1.63% | +6,050 | 12.6% |
| 12 | Sousa | 0.03% | +294,000 | 0.8% |
The displayed probabilities sum to 100.01% because of rounding; the unrounded simulation outputs sum to exactly 100%. Sousa’s underlying title probability was 0.034%, which is why the fair price uses more precision than the displayed percentage.

Why Schroeder came out No. 1
The model projects Schroeder for a league-best 138.6 points per week, with a 10th-to-90th-percentile weekly range of 111.3 to 167.3. Puka Nacua, Tetairoa McMillan and Garrett Wilson form the receiving engine. The structural swing is Drake Maye at pick 80: our valuation ranked him as one of the best selections in the entire draft.
Santos is barely behind at 138.1 projected points per week and owns a slightly higher 90th-percentile ceiling at 169.6. That is why the two teams separate from the field in the most common exact Week 17 top-two configuration—even though that exact pairing appears in only 5.22% of simulations.

Our Week 17 forecast
If we isolate the model’s most likely top-two teams entering Week 17, Schroeder grades as a two-point favorite over Santos, with a projected score of 143.1–141.0 and a total of 284.0. The direct Week 17 score probabilities are 53.3% for Schroeder and 46.7% for Santos, equivalent to fair prices of -115 and +115.

How we did it
We first verified all 240 selections against the official SHGN draft room—20 picks for each of the 12 teams, including the third-round reversal. We then scored the rosters with the Legacy League’s actual full-PPR rules and six-point passing touchdowns.
Player means came from SportsHack’s August 14 projection set. We layered in NFFC ADP from 226 completed 12-team drafts through August 28, the August 30 NFFC injury report and the archived 2026 NFL schedule. Every simulated week set a legal lineup using projected strength and known availability before results were drawn.
The 100,000-season model accounted for byes, clustered injuries, bench replacements, waiver-level fills and correlation within NFL offenses. Each team’s championship share was then converted directly into fair American odds. No vig was added, and no missing player projection was treated as zero.
Best pick and worst pick
Best pick: Oster selected Buffalo Bills QB Josh Allen at No. 43. Allen graded as the model’s best value selection: 9.2 picks after NFFC ADP, 11 spots after the SportsHack rank and +79.9 Draft Value Added. Maye at pick 80 was the second-biggest value and is a major reason Schroeder reached the top of the title board.
Worst pick: Derricks selected San Francisco 49ers WR De’Zhaun Stribling at No. 70. Stribling was the model’s largest reach: NFFC ADP 97.8, SportsHack rank 213 and a 0.2% modeled regular-week start rate. A smaller 5,000-run swap test favored Drake Maye there, but that experiment is directional—not a literal re-draft forecast. The larger lesson is simpler: depth, weekly lineup flexibility and the timing of quarterback value mattered as much as collecting star names.
What could change the forecast
These prices are a snapshot, not a permanent ranking. Injuries, depth-chart changes and the first real weeks of 2026 performance will move the inputs. Five drafted skill players did not have direct SportsHack projection matches at the freeze, and two required disclosed replacement-level assumptions inside the simulation. The official head-to-head calendar was also unavailable, so Weeks 4–14 used randomized valid round-robin schedules.
That uncertainty is exactly why Schroeder’s 17.46% is the right headline. The model has a favorite—but in a $100,000-a-seat league with 12 strong rosters, nobody is close to certain.
Sources and model freeze: official NFFC Legacy League rules and SHGN draft room; NFFC 12-team ADP through August 28; NFFC injuries as of August 30; SportsHack projections vintage August 14; archived 2026 schedule. Base market: 100,000 simulations, seed 8292026.
Model-based fantasy analysis. Fair odds are calculated directly from simulated championship probabilities and include no vig. They are not sportsbook prices, observed results or guarantees. 21+. Analytics only.
Take the rankings with you — the free 2026 fantasy football cheat sheet
Want everything now? Get lifetime access
